Filed: May 10, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-2700 _ Danna Johnson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Accredited Home Lenders, Inc., a * California Corporation; Jim Konrath, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * _ Submitted: May 4, 2007 Filed: May 10, 2007 _ Before RILEY, MAGILL, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Danna Johnson appeals from the district court’s1 dismissal of her pro se civil complaint for
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-2700 _ Danna Johnson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Accredited Home Lenders, Inc., a * California Corporation; Jim Konrath, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * _ Submitted: May 4, 2007 Filed: May 10, 2007 _ Before RILEY, MAGILL, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Danna Johnson appeals from the district court’s1 dismissal of her pro se civil complaint for ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-2700
___________
Danna Johnson, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Western District of Missouri.
Accredited Home Lenders, Inc., a *
California Corporation; Jim Konrath, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: May 4, 2007
Filed: May 10, 2007
___________
Before RILEY, MAGILL, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Danna Johnson appeals from the district court’s1 dismissal of her pro se civil
complaint for failure to state a claim. Upon de novo review, see Farm Credit Servs.
of Am. v. Am. State Bank,
339 F.3d 764, 767 (8th Cir. 2003) (de novo standard of
review), we conclude that the district court correctly dismissed Johnson’s complaint
as barred by the statute of limitations, see Basham v. Fin. Am. Corp.,
583 F.2d 918,
927 (7th Cir. 1978) (failure to bring action under TILA within one year bars action).
1
The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
We decline to consider Johnson’s claims raised for the first time on appeal. See Stone
v. Harry,
364 F.3d 912, 914 (8th Cir. 2004) (declining to address pro se claims and
arguments raised first on appeal).
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-