Filed: Aug. 03, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-1816 _ Paul Love, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Curators of the University of * Missouri; BTi Employee Screening * [UNPUBLISHED] Services; Bill Mitchell, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: July 5, 2007 Filed: August 3, 2007 _ Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Paul Love appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing his action b
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-1816 _ Paul Love, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Curators of the University of * Missouri; BTi Employee Screening * [UNPUBLISHED] Services; Bill Mitchell, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: July 5, 2007 Filed: August 3, 2007 _ Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Paul Love appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing his action ba..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-1816
___________
Paul Love, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Western District of Missouri.
Curators of the University of *
Missouri; BTi Employee Screening * [UNPUBLISHED]
Services; Bill Mitchell, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: July 5, 2007
Filed: August 3, 2007
___________
Before SMITH, GRUENDER, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Paul Love appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing his action based on the
court’s determination that the parties had reached a settlement agreement. Having
carefully reviewed the record, we agree with the district court that the parties reached
a settlement agreement at their August 23, 2005 meeting, and that the terms of the
agreement are embodied in the transcript of the meeting. See Chaganti & Assocs.,
1
The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
P.C. v. Nowotny,
470 F.3d 1215, 1221 (8th Cir. 2006) (appeals court reviews for clear
error district court’s finding that settlement agreement existed), cert. denied,
75
U.S.L.W. 3569 (U.S. June 18, 2007) (No. 06-1377). In addition, we find nothing in
the record to support Love’s unsubstantiated claim that he was coerced into the
agreement.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-