Filed: Sep. 13, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-3035 _ Theodis Brown, Sr. * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Missouri. St. Louis County * Civil Service Commission, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: September 4, 2007 Filed: September 13, 2007 _ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Theodis Brown, Sr., appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se civil complaint and denial
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-3035 _ Theodis Brown, Sr. * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Missouri. St. Louis County * Civil Service Commission, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: September 4, 2007 Filed: September 13, 2007 _ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Theodis Brown, Sr., appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se civil complaint and denial ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-3035
___________
Theodis Brown, Sr. *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Eastern
* District of Missouri.
St. Louis County *
Civil Service Commission, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: September 4, 2007
Filed: September 13, 2007
___________
Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Theodis Brown, Sr., appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his pro se civil
complaint and denial of his motions for reconsideration. After conducting a de novo
review, see Ketchum v. City of West Memphis,
974 F.2d 81, 82-83 (8th Cir. 1992),
we conclude that dismissal of the complaint was proper, and we agree with the district
court that Brown’s Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) motions were untimely.
1
The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Brown’s appellate
motion.
______________________________
-2-