Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Andres Manuel Romero, 06-1173 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 06-1173 Visitors: 42
Filed: Sep. 06, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-1173 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Andres Manuel Romero, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * _ Submitted: August 30, 2007 Filed: September 6, 2007 _ Before BYE, RILEY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Andres Romero appeals the district court’s1 denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion, in which he sought a reduction of his federa
More
                     United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                    ___________

                                    No. 06-1173
                                    ___________

United States of America,                *
                                         *
             Appellee,                   *
                                         * Appeal from the United States
      v.                                 * District Court for the
                                         * District of Minnesota.
Andres Manuel Romero,                    *
                                         *      [UNPUBLISHED]
             Appellant.                  *
                                    ___________

                              Submitted: August 30, 2007
                                 Filed: September 6, 2007
                                  ___________

Before BYE, RILEY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
                            ___________

PER CURIAM.

       Andres Romero appeals the district court’s1 denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)
motion, in which he sought a reduction of his federal drug sentence based on
Amendment 591 to the Sentencing Guidelines. We agree with the district court that
Amendment 591 does not affect Romero’s sentence, and Romero has not argued any
other basis for modification under § 3582(c)(2). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir.
R. 47B. We also deny Romero’s pending appellate motions.
                        ______________________________

      1
        The Honorable Ann D. Montgomery, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer