United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                  ___________

                                  No. 06-2903
                                  ___________

United States of America,              *
                                       *
            Appellee,                  *
                                       * Appeal from the United States
      v.                               * District Court for the
                                       * Northern District of Iowa.
Bradley Dean Craig,                    *
                                       * [UNPUBLISHED]
            Appellant.                 *
                                  ___________

                             Submitted: October 5, 2007
                                Filed: October 18, 2007
                                 ___________

Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
                            ___________

PER CURIAM.

       Bradley Dean Craig appeals the 87-month prison sentences the district court1
imposed after he pleaded guilty to receiving and possessing child pornography. See
18 U.S.C. § 2252A(a)(2)(A), (a)(5)(B). For reversal, Craig argues that the district
court erred in denying his request for a downward variance based on his history of
extensive community service.




      1
       The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Northern District of Iowa.
      We conclude that Craig’s sentences are not unreasonable. See United States v.
Booker, 

, 261-62 (2005) (discussing appellate review). The district court
imposed these sentences--which were at the bottom of the applicable Guidelines
range--after properly considering all of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, including
Craig’s history and circumstances. See Rita v. United States, 

, 2463-
68 (2007) (approving appellate presumption of reasonableness for sentence within
advisory Guidelines range); United States v. Haack, 

, 1003-04 (8th Cir.
2005) (describing appropriate consideration of § 3553(a) factors).

      Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
                      ______________________________




                                         -2-