Filed: Nov. 20, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-1331 _ Alvin Bernal Jackson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas * Department of Correction, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: November 14, 2007 Filed: November 20, 2007 _ Before RILEY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. In light of this court’s recent decision in Simpson v. Norris, 490 F.3d 1029 , 1034-103
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-1331 _ Alvin Bernal Jackson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Arkansas. Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas * Department of Correction, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: November 14, 2007 Filed: November 20, 2007 _ Before RILEY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. In light of this court’s recent decision in Simpson v. Norris, 490 F.3d 1029 , 1034-1036..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 07-1331
___________
Alvin Bernal Jackson, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Arkansas.
Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas *
Department of Correction, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: November 14, 2007
Filed: November 20, 2007
___________
Before RILEY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
In light of this court’s recent decision in Simpson v. Norris,
490 F.3d 1029,
1034-1036 (8th Cir. 2007) (concluding the existence of an Arkansas statute that
precluded the execution of the mentally retarded was irrelevant to whether the
applicant had defaulted an Atkins v. Virginia,
536 U.S. 304, 321 (2002), claim by
failing to bring the claim under the statute), reh’g en banc denied, No. 06-2823 (8th
Cir. Aug. 20, 2007), we reverse and vacate the judgment of the district court and
remand this case to the district court for further proceedings. See
Simpson, 490 F.3d
at 1035-36.
______________________________