Filed: Nov. 19, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-4194 _ Charles Wright, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Northern City of Waterloo, Iowa; Al Bovy, * District of Iowa. in his individual and official * capacities; Rob Michael, in his * [UNPUBLISHED] individual and official capacities, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: November 12, 2007 Filed: November 19, 2007 _ Before MELLOY, BEAM and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Charles Wright ap
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-4194 _ Charles Wright, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Northern City of Waterloo, Iowa; Al Bovy, * District of Iowa. in his individual and official * capacities; Rob Michael, in his * [UNPUBLISHED] individual and official capacities, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: November 12, 2007 Filed: November 19, 2007 _ Before MELLOY, BEAM and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Charles Wright app..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-4194
___________
Charles Wright, *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Northern
City of Waterloo, Iowa; Al Bovy, * District of Iowa.
in his individual and official *
capacities; Rob Michael, in his * [UNPUBLISHED]
individual and official capacities, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: November 12, 2007
Filed: November 19, 2007
___________
Before MELLOY, BEAM and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Charles Wright appeals the district court's1 adverse grant of summary judgment
in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action arising from circumstances surrounding his brief arrest
in October 2004. Having carefully reviewed the record and considered Wright's
1
The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States Magistrate Judge for the
Northern District of Iowa, now United States District Judge for the Southern District
of Iowa, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
arguments, see Larson v. Kempker,
414 F.3d 936, 939 (8th Cir. 2005) (standard of
review), we affirm the well-reasoned opinion of the district court. 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-