Filed: Nov. 08, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-2667 _ William Reed, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of South Dakota. Warden Ricardo Martinez, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: November 2, 2007 Filed: November 8, 2007 _ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. William Reed appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Because the district court correctly conc
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-2667 _ William Reed, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of South Dakota. Warden Ricardo Martinez, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: November 2, 2007 Filed: November 8, 2007 _ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. William Reed appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Because the district court correctly concl..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-2667
___________
William Reed, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of South Dakota.
Warden Ricardo Martinez, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: November 2, 2007
Filed: November 8, 2007
___________
Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
William Reed appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
petition. Because the district court correctly concluded Reed did not establish that 28
U.S.C. § 2255 was inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention, we
affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Karen E. Schreier, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the
District of South Dakota.