Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Napoleon Hartsfield v. Dept. of Corrections, 06-2724 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 06-2724 Visitors: 121
Filed: Nov. 08, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-2724 _ Napoleon Hartsfield, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Department of Corrections; * Charlie Hourihan, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * _ Submitted: November 5, 2007 Filed: November 8, 2007 _ Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Napoleon Hartsfield appeals the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment to the remaining defendan
More
                     United States Court of Appeals
                           FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                   ___________

                                   No. 06-2724
                                   ___________

Napoleon Hartsfield,                    *
                                        *
             Appellant,                 *
                                        * Appeal from the United States
      v.                                * District Court for the
                                        * Southern District of Iowa.
Department of Corrections;              *
Charlie Hourihan,                       * [UNPUBLISHED]
                                        *
             Appellees.                 *
                                   ___________

                             Submitted: November 5, 2007
                                Filed: November 8, 2007
                                 ___________

Before WOLLMAN, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
                        ___________

PER CURIAM.

       Napoleon Hartsfield appeals the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment to
the remaining defendant in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action following this court’s remand
for further proceedings on a retaliation claim. We conclude that summary judgment
was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. The judgment is affirmed. See
8th Cir. R. 47B.
                       ______________________________


      1
        The Honorable James E. Gritzner, United States District Judge for the Southern
District of Iowa.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer