Filed: Dec. 03, 2007
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-3887 _ Melvin Leroy Tyler; Kevin Bromwell; * Duc Duong, * * Appellants, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Marion V. Favazza, Clerk, Circuit * Court of St. Louis City, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: November 13, 2007 Filed: December 3, 2007 _ Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Missouri inmates Melvin Leroy Tyler, Kevin Bromwell, and
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-3887 _ Melvin Leroy Tyler; Kevin Bromwell; * Duc Duong, * * Appellants, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Marion V. Favazza, Clerk, Circuit * Court of St. Louis City, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: November 13, 2007 Filed: December 3, 2007 _ Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Missouri inmates Melvin Leroy Tyler, Kevin Bromwell, and D..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-3887
___________
Melvin Leroy Tyler; Kevin Bromwell; *
Duc Duong, *
*
Appellants, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Missouri.
Marion V. Favazza, Clerk, Circuit *
Court of St. Louis City, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: November 13, 2007
Filed: December 3, 2007
___________
Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Missouri inmates Melvin Leroy Tyler, Kevin Bromwell, and Duc Duong appeal
following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in their 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the record and considered appellants’
arguments, we find no basis for reversing the orders challenged on appeal.
Accordingly we affirm, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, although we modify the dismissal of the
1
The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Missouri.
supplemental state law claims to be without prejudice, see Franklin v. Zain,
152 F.3d
783, 786 (8th Cir. 1998). We also deny appellants’ pending motions.
______________________________
-2-