Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

George Stine Smith v. John C. Taylor, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas, 7327 (1963)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 7327 Visitors: 24
Filed: Jun. 26, 1963
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 321 F.2d 52 George Stine SMITH, Appellant, v. John C. TAYLOR, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, Kansas, Appellee. No. 7327. United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit. June 26, 1963. John J. Mullins, Jr., Denver, Colo., for appellant. Benjamin E. Franklin, Asst. U.S. Atty. (Newell A. George, U.S. Atty., was with him on the brief), for appellee. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and SETH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. 1 This is an eppeal from an order denying an application
More

321 F.2d 52

George Stine SMITH, Appellant,
v.
John C. TAYLOR, Warden, United States Penitentiary,
Leavenworth, Kansas, Appellee.

No. 7327.

United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit.

June 26, 1963.

John J. Mullins, Jr., Denver, Colo., for appellant.

Benjamin E. Franklin, Asst. U.S. Atty. (Newell A. George, U.S. Atty., was with him on the brief), for appellee.

Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and SETH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

This is an eppeal from an order denying an application for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner alleges no facts whatever showing he is entitled to discharge from custody. Apparently what he really seeks is certain documents from the trial court. For that habeas corpus is not an appropriate remedy.

2

Affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer