Filed: Mar. 25, 2008
Latest Update: Apr. 11, 2017
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-1365 _ William Myron Thurman, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. Linda Sanders, Warden, * FCI - Forrest City, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: March 18, 2008 Filed: March 25, 2008 _ Before BYE, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Federal inmate William Myron Thurman appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing with prejudice his 28 U.S.
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-1365 _ William Myron Thurman, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. Linda Sanders, Warden, * FCI - Forrest City, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: March 18, 2008 Filed: March 25, 2008 _ Before BYE, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Federal inmate William Myron Thurman appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing with prejudice his 28 U.S.C..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 07-1365
___________
William Myron Thurman, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Eastern
* District of Arkansas.
Linda Sanders, Warden, *
FCI - Forrest City, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: March 18, 2008
Filed: March 25, 2008
___________
Before BYE, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Federal inmate William Myron Thurman appeals the district court’s1 order
dismissing with prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which he challenged the
Bureau of Prisons’ calculation of the start date of his federal sentence. Following
careful review, see Hill v. Morrison,
349 F.3d 1089, 1091 (8th Cir. 2003) (de novo
1
The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the
Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District
of Arkansas.
standard of review), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.2 See 8th
Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
2
We do not consider Thurman’s constitutional arguments raised for the first
time on appeal. See Stone v. Harry,
364 F.3d 912, 914-15 (8th Cir. 2004).
-2-