Filed: Apr. 08, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-3972 _ Delsita Yvette Day, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Department of Veterans Affairs; James * B. Peake,1 Secretary, U.S. * [UNPUBLISHED] Department of Veterans Affairs, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: March 21, 2008 Filed: April 8, 2008 _ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Delsita Yvette Day, an African American, appeals the dis
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 06-3972 _ Delsita Yvette Day, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Department of Veterans Affairs; James * B. Peake,1 Secretary, U.S. * [UNPUBLISHED] Department of Veterans Affairs, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: March 21, 2008 Filed: April 8, 2008 _ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Delsita Yvette Day, an African American, appeals the dist..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 06-3972
___________
Delsita Yvette Day, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
Department of Veterans Affairs; James *
B. Peake,1 Secretary, U.S. * [UNPUBLISHED]
Department of Veterans Affairs, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: March 21, 2008
Filed: April 8, 2008
___________
Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Delsita Yvette Day, an African American, appeals the district court’s2 adverse
grant of summary judgment in her Title VII action. To the extent Day’s brief properly
1
James B. Peake has been appointed to serve as Secretary of Veterans Affairs,
and is substituted as appellee pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c).
2
The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
raises issues for our review, see Slack v. St. Louis County Gov’t,
919 F.2d 98, 99-100
(8th Cir. 1990) (per curiam), we find no basis for overturning the district court’s well-
reasoned decision, see Fair v. Norris,
480 F.3d 865, 869 (8th Cir. 2007) (standard of
review); Glick v. Henderson,
855 F.2d 536, 541 (8th Cir. 1988) (civil litigant has no
constitutional or statutory right to effective assistance of counsel). Accordingly, we
affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-