Filed: Jun. 26, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-1091 _ Michael O’Grady, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Robert M. A. Johnson; Daniel Klint; * District of Minnesota. Synthia O’Grady; Mort McBain; * Thomas Finley; Scott Corbett, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * _ Submitted: June 6, 2008 Filed: June 26, 2008 _ Before BYE, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Michael O’Grady appeals the district court’s1 judgment dismissing his
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-1091 _ Michael O’Grady, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Robert M. A. Johnson; Daniel Klint; * District of Minnesota. Synthia O’Grady; Mort McBain; * Thomas Finley; Scott Corbett, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * _ Submitted: June 6, 2008 Filed: June 26, 2008 _ Before BYE, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Michael O’Grady appeals the district court’s1 judgment dismissing his c..
More
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 07-1091 ___________ Michael O’Grady, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Robert M. A. Johnson; Daniel Klint; * District of Minnesota. Synthia O’Grady; Mort McBain; * Thomas Finley; Scott Corbett, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * ___________ Submitted: June 6, 2008 Filed: June 26, 2008 ___________ Before BYE, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ___________ PER CURIAM. Michael O’Grady appeals the district court’s1 judgment dismissing his civil rights complaint. Having carefully considered O’Grady’s arguments on appeal, and upon de novo review, we conclude that dismissal was proper. We agree with the district court that O’Grady either failed to state a claim with regard to his allegations 1 The Honorable Joan N. Ericksen, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jeanne J. Graham, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. related to child custody and child support enforcement, or failed to assert a basis for federal subject matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. The pending motions are denied. ______________________________ -2-
