Filed: Jun. 11, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-1034 _ Abraham Sowe, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of v. * an Order of the Bureau of Immigration * and Customs Enforcement. Michael B. Mukasey,1 Attorney * General of the United States, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Respondent. * _ Submitted: June 5, 2008 Filed: June 11, 2008 _ Before BYE, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Abraham Sowe, a native of Gambia and a citizen of Sweden, petitions for review of an order of the B
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-1034 _ Abraham Sowe, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of v. * an Order of the Bureau of Immigration * and Customs Enforcement. Michael B. Mukasey,1 Attorney * General of the United States, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Respondent. * _ Submitted: June 5, 2008 Filed: June 11, 2008 _ Before BYE, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Abraham Sowe, a native of Gambia and a citizen of Sweden, petitions for review of an order of the Bu..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 07-1034
___________
Abraham Sowe, *
*
Petitioner, *
* Petition for Review of
v. * an Order of the Bureau of Immigration
* and Customs Enforcement.
Michael B. Mukasey,1 Attorney *
General of the United States, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Respondent. *
___________
Submitted: June 5, 2008
Filed: June 11, 2008
___________
Before BYE, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Abraham Sowe, a native of Gambia and a citizen of Sweden, petitions for
review of an order of the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)
ordering him removed. We lack jurisdiction to review Sowe’s petition because he was
admitted to the United States under the Visa Waiver Program (VWP) and, as a
condition of entry under the VWP, he waived his right to contest removal on any
ground other than an application for asylum. See 8 U.S.C. § 1187(a)-(b); Lacey v.
1
Michael B. Mukasey, now Attorney General of the United States, is substituted
as respondent pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c).
Gonzales,
499 F.3d 514, 518 (6th Cir. 2007); Handa v. Clark,
401 F.3d 1129, 1133
(9th Cir. 2005).
Accordingly, we dismiss the petition.
______________________________
-2-