Filed: Jun. 03, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-1176 _ Teresa J. Feucht, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of South Dakota. Leeann Pierce, Chapter 7 Trustee, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: May 16, 2008 Filed: June 3, 2008 _ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Chapter 7 debtor Teresa Feucht appeals from the district court’s1 decision affirming the bankruptcy court’s2 exemption order i
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-1176 _ Teresa J. Feucht, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of South Dakota. Leeann Pierce, Chapter 7 Trustee, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: May 16, 2008 Filed: June 3, 2008 _ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Chapter 7 debtor Teresa Feucht appeals from the district court’s1 decision affirming the bankruptcy court’s2 exemption order in..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 07-1176
___________
Teresa J. Feucht, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of South Dakota.
Leeann Pierce, Chapter 7 Trustee, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: May 16, 2008
Filed: June 3, 2008
___________
Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Chapter 7 debtor Teresa Feucht appeals from the district court’s1 decision
affirming the bankruptcy court’s2 exemption order in favor of trustee Leeann Pierce.
Upon review of the bankruptcy court’s factual findings for clear error, and its legal
1
The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the
District of South Dakota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable
John E. Simko, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of South Dakota.
2
The Honorable Irvin N. Hoyt, Chief Judge, United States Bankruptcy Court for
the District of South Dakota.
conclusions de novo, see In re Foust,
52 F.3d 766, 768 (8th Cir. 1995), we find no
basis for reversal. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B
______________________________
-2-