Filed: Jul. 08, 2008
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-1935 _ Charles Mims, Jr., * * Appellant, * * Louise Mims, Guardian ad Litem for * Charles Mims, Jr.; Charnella Mims, * Guardian ad Litem for Charles Mims, * Jr., * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Plaintiffs, * District of Nebraska. * v. * [UNPUBLISHED] * United Parcel Services, a Corporation, * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: June 25, 2008 Filed: July 8, 2008 _ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-1935 _ Charles Mims, Jr., * * Appellant, * * Louise Mims, Guardian ad Litem for * Charles Mims, Jr.; Charnella Mims, * Guardian ad Litem for Charles Mims, * Jr., * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Plaintiffs, * District of Nebraska. * v. * [UNPUBLISHED] * United Parcel Services, a Corporation, * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: June 25, 2008 Filed: July 8, 2008 _ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 07-1935
___________
Charles Mims, Jr., *
*
Appellant, *
*
Louise Mims, Guardian ad Litem for *
Charles Mims, Jr.; Charnella Mims, *
Guardian ad Litem for Charles Mims, *
Jr., * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the
Plaintiffs, * District of Nebraska.
*
v. * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
United Parcel Services, a Corporation, *
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: June 25, 2008
Filed: July 8, 2008
___________
Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Charles Mims, Jr., appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in his employment-discrimination suit brought under Title VII and the
Americans with Disabilities Act, together with his state-law claims. After reviewing
the record de novo, viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences from it in a
light most favorable to Mims, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman,
289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir.
2002) (standard of review), we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the
reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the
district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Mims’s request for preparation of
a transcript at government expense and United Parcel Service’s motion for leave to
file a sur-reply.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Joseph F. Bataillon, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the District of Nebraska.
-2-