Filed: Feb. 03, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-3453 _ Michael S. Lacy, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * Tax Court. * Commissioner of Internal Revenue, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: January 28, 2009 Filed: February 3, 2009 _ Before RILEY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Michael Lacy challenges the tax court’s1 order dismissing his pro se petition and imposing a $7,500 penalty under 26 U.S.C. § 6673. After careful review, we conclu
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-3453 _ Michael S. Lacy, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * Tax Court. * Commissioner of Internal Revenue, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: January 28, 2009 Filed: February 3, 2009 _ Before RILEY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Michael Lacy challenges the tax court’s1 order dismissing his pro se petition and imposing a $7,500 penalty under 26 U.S.C. § 6673. After careful review, we conclud..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 07-3453
___________
Michael S. Lacy, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * Tax Court.
*
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: January 28, 2009
Filed: February 3, 2009
___________
Before RILEY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Michael Lacy challenges the tax court’s1 order dismissing his pro se petition
and imposing a $7,500 penalty under 26 U.S.C. § 6673. After careful review, we
conclude that the dismissal and the penalty were each proper. Accordingly, we affirm.
See 8th Cir. R. 47B. All pending motions are denied.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Stanley J. Goldberg, United States Tax Court Judge.
