Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Taariq S. Irshaad v. Deputy Aaron Hess, 07-2712 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 07-2712 Visitors: 10
Filed: Apr. 07, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-2712 _ Taariq S. Irshaad, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Deputy Aaron Hess; Captain Stacy * Sinner, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. * _ Submitted: April 3, 2009 Filed: April 7, 2009 _ Before RILEY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Taariq Irshaad appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After de no
More
                     United States Court of Appeals
                           FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                   ___________

                                   No. 07-2712
                                   ___________

Taariq S. Irshaad,                   *
                                     *
           Appellant,                *
                                     * Appeal from the United States
      v.                             * District Court for the
                                     * District of Minnesota.
Deputy Aaron Hess; Captain Stacy     *
Sinner,                              * [UNPUBLISHED]
                                     *
           Appellees.                *
                                ___________

                             Submitted: April 3, 2009
                                Filed: April 7, 2009
                                 ___________

Before RILEY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
                            ___________

PER CURIAM.

        Taariq Irshaad appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment
in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After de novo review, see Ramlet v. E.F. Johnson Co.,
507 F.3d 1149
, 1152 (8th Cir. 2007), we conclude that summary judgment was
properly granted because there was no genuine issue as to any material fact and
appellees were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We also hold that the district


      1
        The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, United States District Judge for the
District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable
Arthur J. Boylan, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
court did not abuse its discretion in denying Irshaad’s motion for appointment of
counsel. See Stevens v. Redwing, 
146 F.3d 538
, 546 (8th Cir. 1998). Accordingly, we
affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                        ______________________________




                                        -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer