Filed: May 14, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-3390 _ Ricky Gerald Moore, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: May 7, 2009 Filed: May 14, 2009 _ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Ricky Gerald Moore appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment-discrimination action
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 07-3390 _ Ricky Gerald Moore, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. * _ Submitted: May 7, 2009 Filed: May 14, 2009 _ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Ricky Gerald Moore appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his employment-discrimination action...
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 07-3390
___________
Ricky Gerald Moore, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Missouri.
John E. Potter, Postmaster General, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: May 7, 2009
Filed: May 14, 2009
___________
Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Ricky Gerald Moore appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in his employment-discrimination action. After reviewing the record de
novo, viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences from it in a light most
favorable to Moore, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman,
289 F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir. 2002)
(standard of review), we conclude summary judgment was proper for the reasons
stated by the district court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
1
The Honorable Mary Ann L. Medler, United States Magistrate Judge for the
Eastern District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).