Filed: Jun. 23, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 08-1502 _ Steven L. Hibshman, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, * Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: June 5, 2009 Filed: June 23, 2009 _ Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Steven L. Hibshman appeals the district court’s1 order affirming the denial of supplement
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 08-1502 _ Steven L. Hibshman, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Arkansas. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, * Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: June 5, 2009 Filed: June 23, 2009 _ Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Steven L. Hibshman appeals the district court’s1 order affirming the denial of supplementa..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 08-1502
___________
Steven L. Hibshman, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Eastern
* District of Arkansas.
Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, *
Social Security Administration, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: June 5, 2009
Filed: June 23, 2009
___________
Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Steven L. Hibshman appeals the district court’s1 order affirming the denial of
supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits. After careful review
of the record, see Juszczyk v. Astrue,
542 F.3d 626, 631 (8th Cir. 2008) (standard of
1
The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the
Honorable H. David Young, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District
of Arkansas.
review), we find no merit to Hibshman’s arguments for reversal. Accordingly, we
affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-