Filed: Aug. 28, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 08-1711 _ Ikechi Kallys Albert, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Dakota Communities, Inc.; Kevin * Hondl, White Male, Program Director; * [UNPUBLISHED] Lori Kingston, White Female, Vice * President of Human Resources; Lisa * Math, White Female, Program Director; * Elizabeth Warner, White Female, * Employee, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: August 20, 2009 Filed: August 28
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 08-1711 _ Ikechi Kallys Albert, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Dakota Communities, Inc.; Kevin * Hondl, White Male, Program Director; * [UNPUBLISHED] Lori Kingston, White Female, Vice * President of Human Resources; Lisa * Math, White Female, Program Director; * Elizabeth Warner, White Female, * Employee, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: August 20, 2009 Filed: August 28,..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 08-1711
___________
Ikechi Kallys Albert, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Minnesota.
Dakota Communities, Inc.; Kevin *
Hondl, White Male, Program Director; * [UNPUBLISHED]
Lori Kingston, White Female, Vice *
President of Human Resources; Lisa *
Math, White Female, Program Director; *
Elizabeth Warner, White Female, *
Employee, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: August 20, 2009
Filed: August 28, 2009
___________
Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Ikechi Kallys Albert appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in his action asserting employment discrimination, retaliation, and state law
claims. After reviewing the record de novo, viewing the evidence and all reasonable
inferences from it in a light most favorable to Albert, see Jacob-Mua v. Veneman,
289
F.3d 517, 520 (8th Cir. 2002) (standard of review), we conclude summary judgment
was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, we deny Albert’s
pending motions and we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
-2-