Filed: Aug. 06, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 08-1596 _ Luis Alfredo Vasquez, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of an v. * Order of the Board of * Immigration Appeals. 1 Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General * of the United States, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Respondent. * _ Submitted: July 30, 2009 Filed: August 6, 2009 _ Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Luis Alfredo Vasquez petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 08-1596 _ Luis Alfredo Vasquez, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review of an v. * Order of the Board of * Immigration Appeals. 1 Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General * of the United States, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Respondent. * _ Submitted: July 30, 2009 Filed: August 6, 2009 _ Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Luis Alfredo Vasquez petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that a..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 08-1596
___________
Luis Alfredo Vasquez, *
*
Petitioner, *
* Petition for Review of an
v. * Order of the Board of
* Immigration Appeals.
1
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General *
of the United States, * [UNPUBLISHED]
*
Respondent. *
___________
Submitted: July 30, 2009
Filed: August 6, 2009
___________
Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Luis Alfredo Vasquez petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration Appeals (BIA) that affirmed an immigration judge’s denial of his motion
to reopen. Because we conclude Vasquez’s petition for review was untimely filed
more than 30 days after the BIA issued its final order, we lack jurisdiction to review
the order. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) (petition for review “must be filed” not later than
1
Eric H. Holder, Jr., has been appointed to serve as Attorney General of the
United States, and is substituted as respondent pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate
Procedure 43(c).
30 days after date of final order); Fed. R. App. P. 26(a) (computation of time); Yang
v. Mukasey,
510 F.3d 793, 795-96 (8th Cir. 2007) (noting denial of motion to reopen
is final order that has to be appealed within 30 days); Skurtu v. Mukasey,
552 F.3d
651, 658 (8th Cir. 2008) (dismissing petition for lack of jurisdiction because 30-day
time limit for filing petition is mandatory and jurisdictional).
Accordingly, we dismiss the petition.
______________________________
-2-