Filed: Dec. 17, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 09-1838 _ Carlos F. Calhoun, also known as * William Anderson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. John Baldwin, Director, Iowa * Department of Corrections; Elizabeth * [UNPUBLISHED] Robinson, and all members, Iowa * Board of Parole, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: December 16, 2009 Filed: December 17, 2009 _ Before BYE, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM.
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 09-1838 _ Carlos F. Calhoun, also known as * William Anderson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. John Baldwin, Director, Iowa * Department of Corrections; Elizabeth * [UNPUBLISHED] Robinson, and all members, Iowa * Board of Parole, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: December 16, 2009 Filed: December 17, 2009 _ Before BYE, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 09-1838
___________
Carlos F. Calhoun, also known as *
William Anderson, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Southern District of Iowa.
John Baldwin, Director, Iowa *
Department of Corrections; Elizabeth * [UNPUBLISHED]
Robinson, and all members, Iowa *
Board of Parole, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: December 16, 2009
Filed: December 17, 2009
___________
Before BYE, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Carlos Calhoun, currently incarcerated in federal prison after escaping from an
Iowa work release program, appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful de novo review, see Johnson
v. Blaukat,
453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006), we affirm for the reasons stated by
1
The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States District Judge for the Southern
District of Iowa.
the district court, see Moody v. Daggett,
429 U.S. 78, 86 n.7, 88 n.9 (inmate not
entitled to revocation hearing while in prison on separate offense; no due process
violation where “pending warrant and detainer adversely affect[ed] [inmate’s] prison
classification and qualification for institutional programs”). See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-