Filed: Dec. 14, 2009
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 09-1536 _ Kimberly Lawson, as Mother and Next * Friend of S.L., * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Des Moines Independent School * District; Mary Gordon, Individually * [UNPUBLISHED] and in her official capacity, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: November 27, 2009 Filed: December 14, 2009 _ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Kimberly Law
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 09-1536 _ Kimberly Lawson, as Mother and Next * Friend of S.L., * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Des Moines Independent School * District; Mary Gordon, Individually * [UNPUBLISHED] and in her official capacity, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: November 27, 2009 Filed: December 14, 2009 _ Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Kimberly Laws..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 09-1536
___________
Kimberly Lawson, as Mother and Next *
Friend of S.L., *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Southern District of Iowa.
Des Moines Independent School *
District; Mary Gordon, Individually * [UNPUBLISHED]
and in her official capacity, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: November 27, 2009
Filed: December 14, 2009
___________
Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Kimberly Lawson appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of
summary judgment in her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the
record, see Johnson v. Blaukat,
453 F.3d 1108, 1112 (8th Cir. 2006), we conclude that
1
The Honorable Ross A. Walters, United States Magistrate Judge for the
Southern District of Iowa, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
summary judgment was proper because Lawson failed to demonstrate the denial of a
constitutional right. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-