Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ronnie Blade v. United States, 08-3480 (2010)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 08-3480 Visitors: 41
Filed: Feb. 04, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 08-3480 _ Ronnie Blade, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Western District of Missouri. * United States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: January 13, 2010 Filed: February 4, 2010 _ Before BYE, RILEY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Ronnie Blade appeals the district court’s1 denial of his Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g) motion for the return of property. Upon careful revi
More
                     United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                    ___________

                                    No. 08-3480
                                    ___________

Ronnie Blade,                            *
                                         *
             Appellant,                  * Appeal from the United States
                                         * District Court for the
      v.                                 * Western District of Missouri.
                                         *
United States of America,                *     [UNPUBLISHED]
                                         *
             Appellee.                   *
                                    ___________

                              Submitted: January 13, 2010
                                 Filed: February 4, 2010
                                  ___________

Before BYE, RILEY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
                            ___________

PER CURIAM.

       Ronnie Blade appeals the district court’s1 denial of his Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(g)
motion for the return of property. Upon careful review, see Jackson v. United States,
526 F.3d 394
, 396 (8th Cir. 2008) (legal conclusions reviewed de novo and findings
of fact reviewed for clear error), we find no basis for reversal. We also find no abuse
of discretion in the district court’s denial of Blade’s motion for appointed counsel.
See Phillips v. Jasper County Jail, 
437 F.3d 791
, 794 (8th Cir. 2006) (district court’s



      1
        The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
denial of appointed counsel reviewed for abuse of discretion; relevant factors).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                      ______________________________




                                      -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer