Filed: Feb. 02, 2010
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 08-3958 _ Ollie M. Hollman, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Thomas L. Nellums, Sr., Owner, Tee * and E Trucking/Tee and E Trucking, * [UNPUBLISHED] Inc., * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: January 28, 2010 Filed: February 2, 2010 _ Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Ollie M. Hollman appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary j
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 08-3958 _ Ollie M. Hollman, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Thomas L. Nellums, Sr., Owner, Tee * and E Trucking/Tee and E Trucking, * [UNPUBLISHED] Inc., * * Appellee. * _ Submitted: January 28, 2010 Filed: February 2, 2010 _ Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Ollie M. Hollman appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary ju..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 08-3958
___________
Ollie M. Hollman, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* Eastern District of Missouri.
Thomas L. Nellums, Sr., Owner, Tee *
and E Trucking/Tee and E Trucking, * [UNPUBLISHED]
Inc., *
*
Appellee. *
___________
Submitted: January 28, 2010
Filed: February 2, 2010
___________
Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Ollie M. Hollman appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in her employment-discrimination suit against her former employer. Having
carefully reviewed the record and considered Hollman’s arguments, we find no basis
for reversal. See Gordon v. Shafer Contracting Co.,
469 F.3d 1191, 1194 (8th Cir.
1
The Honorable Henry Edward Autrey, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Missouri.
2006) (de novo standard of review). Accordingly, we deny the parties’ pending
motions and affirm the district court’s judgment. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-