Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Keeyon Dunbar, 15-2534 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 15-2534 Visitors: 82
Filed: Oct. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-2534 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Keeyon M. Dunbar lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City _ Submitted: October 7, 2015 Filed: October 14, 2015 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. While Keeyon Dunbar was serving a period of supervised release on a fed
More
                  United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 15-2534
                         ___________________________

                              United States of America

                         lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

                                            v.

                                  Keeyon M. Dunbar

                       lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
                                       ____________

                      Appeal from United States District Court
                 for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
                                  ____________

                             Submitted: October 7, 2015
                              Filed: October 14, 2015
                                   [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
                          ____________

PER CURIAM.

      While Keeyon Dunbar was serving a period of supervised release on a federal
criminal sentence, he admitted to the district court1 that he had violated his release

      1
       The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
conditions. The court revoked supervised release and imposed a within-Guidelines-
range revocation sentence of 11 months in prison. On appeal, Dunbar contends that
the sentence is substantively unreasonable. Upon careful review of the record, we
conclude that the court did not abuse its discretion. See United States v. Miller, 
557 F.3d 910
, 915-16 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review). The judgment is affirmed, and
we grant counsel leave to withdraw.
                       ______________________________




                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer