Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HLG Farms II v. City of Hamburg, 15-1432 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 15-1432 Visitors: 12
Filed: Oct. 22, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-1432 _ HLG Farms II, LLC lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. City of Hamburg, an Iowa Municipal Corporation lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant John Does, 1-10 lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - St. Joseph _ Submitted: October 5, 2015 Filed: October 22, 2015 [Unpublished] _ Before SMITH, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIA
More
              United States Court of Appeals
                         For the Eighth Circuit
                     ___________________________

                             No. 15-1432
                     ___________________________

                             HLG Farms II, LLC

                     lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

                                        v.

              City of Hamburg, an Iowa Municipal Corporation

                   lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

                                John Does, 1-10

                          lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant
                                  ____________

                 Appeal from United States District Court
              for the Western District of Missouri - St. Joseph
                              ____________

                         Submitted: October 5, 2015
                          Filed: October 22, 2015
                               [Unpublished]
                              ____________

Before SMITH, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.
       The City of Hamburg, Iowa (Hamburg) appeals the district court’s1
enforcement of a settlement agreement between Hamburg and HLG Farms II, LLC.
After carefully reviewing the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we find no
basis for reversal. See Transcon. Ins. Co. v. Rainwater Constr. Co., LLC, 
509 F.3d 454
, 456 (8th Cir. 2007) (de novo review of district court interpretation of settlement
agreement). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. Rule 47B.
                       ______________________________




      1
      The Honorable Sarah W. Hays, United States Magistrate Judge for the
Western District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by
consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer