Filed: Nov. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-1924 _ Venancio Odilo Avila-Morales lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General of United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: October 30, 2015 Filed: November 9, 2015 [Unpublished] _ Before SMITH, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Venancio Odilo Avila-Morales, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-1924 _ Venancio Odilo Avila-Morales lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General of United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: October 30, 2015 Filed: November 9, 2015 [Unpublished] _ Before SMITH, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Venancio Odilo Avila-Morales, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-1924
___________________________
Venancio Odilo Avila-Morales
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General of United States
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
____________
Submitted: October 30, 2015
Filed: November 9, 2015
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Venancio Odilo Avila-Morales, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for
review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming an immigration
judge’s denial of his applications for asylum and withholding of removal. After
careful consideration of the record and the parties’ submissions, see Matul-Hernandez
v. Holder,
685 F.3d 707, 710-13 (8th Cir. 2012), we deny the petition, because we
conclude that substantial evidence supports the finding that Avila-Morales failed to
establish past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution, on account of
any protected ground, see Uli v. Mukasey,
533 F.3d 950, 955, 958 (8th Cir. 2008).
The petition for review is denied. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-