Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Steve Bader v. Rush, 15-2512 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 15-2512 Visitors: 23
Filed: Dec. 08, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-2512 _ Steve Scott Bader lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Rush, Field Sergeant, North Central Unit; Cooper, Field Lieutenant, North Central Unit; Peters, Corporal, North Central Unit; Hatman, Lieutenant, North Central Unit Laundry Supervisor lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Batesville _ Submitted: November 30, 2015 Filed: Decem
More
                United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 15-2512
                        ___________________________

                                 Steve Scott Bader

                       lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

                                           v.

Rush, Field Sergeant, North Central Unit; Cooper, Field Lieutenant, North Central
 Unit; Peters, Corporal, North Central Unit; Hatman, Lieutenant, North Central
                            Unit Laundry Supervisor

                     lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
                                      ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                 for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Batesville
                                  ____________

                         Submitted: November 30, 2015
                           Filed: December 8, 2015
                                [Unpublished]
                                ____________

Before SMITH, BYE, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
                            ____________

PER CURIAM.
       Steve Bader appeals the district court’s1 preservice dismissal, without
prejudice, of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the record and
Bader’s arguments on appeal, we conclude that the dismissal was proper for the
reasons stated below. See Moore v. Sims, 
200 F.3d 1170
, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per
curiam) (28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) dismissal is reviewed de novo); Cooper v.
Schriro, 
189 F.3d 781
, 783 (8th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (28 U.S.C. § 1915A dismissal
is reviewed de novo). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                       ______________________________




      1
       The Honorable Kristine G. Baker, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Beth
Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

                                        -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer