Filed: Jan. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-1455 _ Regina D. Coates lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Southwest Airlines Company lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock _ Submitted: November 12, 2015 Filed: January 7, 2016 _ Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Regina D. Coates appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-1455 _ Regina D. Coates lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Southwest Airlines Company lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock _ Submitted: November 12, 2015 Filed: January 7, 2016 _ Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Regina D. Coates appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment i..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-1455
___________________________
Regina D. Coates
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Southwest Airlines Company
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock
____________
Submitted: November 12, 2015
Filed: January 7, 2016
____________
Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Regina D. Coates appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in her action under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Upon de
novo review, see Burciaga v. Ravago Americas, LLC,
791 F.3d 930, 934 (8th Cir.
1
The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas.
2015), we agree with the district court that there were no jury issues on Coates’s
FMLA discrimination claim, see Hudson v. Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc.,
787 F.3d 861,
866 (8th Cir. 2015) (discrimination claim arises when employer takes adverse action
against employee for exercising rights to which she is entitled under FMLA; where
employer bases its adverse decision on honestly-held belief unrelated to FMLA, it is
not discriminatory even if belief is mistaken); or on her FMLA entitlement claim, as
she was granted such leave, see Quinn v. St. Louis County,
653 F.3d 745, 753 (8th
Cir. 2011) (for interference (also known as entitlement) claim, employers are
prohibited from interfering with, restraining, or denying employee’s exercise or
attempted exercise of any right contained in FMLA; while interference includes
discouraging employee from using such leave, employee must also show that
employer denied employee entitlements under FMLA). The judgment of the district
court is affirmed.
______________________________
-2-