Filed: Jan. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-2059 _ James F. Boschert lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis _ Submitted: January 5, 2016 Filed: January 15, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before SMITH, BYE and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. James F. Boschert appeals the district court’s1 dismissal
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-2059 _ James F. Boschert lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis _ Submitted: January 5, 2016 Filed: January 15, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before SMITH, BYE and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. James F. Boschert appeals the district court’s1 dismissal ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-2059
___________________________
James F. Boschert
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: January 5, 2016
Filed: January 15, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before SMITH, BYE and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
James F. Boschert appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his diversity action
under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). We agree with the district court that
1
The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri.
dismissal for failure to state a claim was warranted, see Mountain Home Flight Serv.,
Inc. v. Baxter Cnty., Ark.,
758 F.3d 1038, 1042-43 (8th Cir. 2014) (de novo review),
and we find no merit to Boschert’s objections to the no-argument designation of the
instant appeal. The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-