Filed: Mar. 04, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-2740 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Warren Clinton lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield _ Submitted: March 4, 2016 Filed: March 4, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before BENTON, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Federal prisoner Warren Daniel Clinton appeals the district court’s1 order c
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-2740 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Warren Clinton lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield _ Submitted: March 4, 2016 Filed: March 4, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before BENTON, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Federal prisoner Warren Daniel Clinton appeals the district court’s1 order co..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-2740
___________________________
United States of America
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee
v.
Warren Clinton
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield
____________
Submitted: March 4, 2016
Filed: March 4, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before BENTON, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Federal prisoner Warren Daniel Clinton appeals the district court’s1 order
committing him for mental health care or treatment under 18 U.S.C. § 4245. Having
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
There is no clear error in the district court’s conclusion that a preponderance
of the evidence established that Clinton was in need of hospitalization for care or
treatment. See 18 U.S.C. § 4245(d) (burden of proof); United States v. Bean,
373 F.3d
877, 879 (8th Cir. 2004) (standard of review).
The judgment is affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. See
8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the
Honorable David P. Rush, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of
Missouri.
-2-