Filed: Apr. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-2629 _ PAULA FESENMEYER lllllllllllllllllllll PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT v. LAND BANK OF KC; KEVIN BERGMAN; THEODORE G. RICHARDSON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A LICENSED ATTORNEY; WILLIAM D. GEARY, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A LICENSED ATTORNEY; CHAD STEWART, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A LICENSED ATTORNEY; TED ANDERSON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A LICENSED ATTORNEY lllllllllllllllllllll DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES _ APPEAL FROM UNITED STATES
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-2629 _ PAULA FESENMEYER lllllllllllllllllllll PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT v. LAND BANK OF KC; KEVIN BERGMAN; THEODORE G. RICHARDSON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A LICENSED ATTORNEY; WILLIAM D. GEARY, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A LICENSED ATTORNEY; CHAD STEWART, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A LICENSED ATTORNEY; TED ANDERSON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A LICENSED ATTORNEY lllllllllllllllllllll DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES _ APPEAL FROM UNITED STATES D..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-2629
___________________________
PAULA FESENMEYER
lllllllllllllllllllll PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT
v.
LAND BANK OF KC; KEVIN BERGMAN; THEODORE G.
RICHARDSON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A LICENSED
ATTORNEY; WILLIAM D. GEARY, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY
AS A LICENSED ATTORNEY; CHAD STEWART, IN HIS
OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A LICENSED ATTORNEY; TED
ANDERSON, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A LICENSED ATTORNEY
lllllllllllllllllllll DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
____________
APPEAL FROM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI - KANSAS CITY
____________
SUBMITTED: April 4, 2016
FILED: April 8, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
BEFORE LOKEN, BYE, AND KELLY, CIRCUIT JUDGES.
____________
PER CURIAM.
PAULA FESENMEYER APPEALS AFTER THE DISTRICT
COURT1 DISMISSED HER PRO SE ACTION UNDER THE
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA), AS BARRED BY
RES JUDICATA. IN HER BRIEF ON APPEAL, SHE CHALLENGES
ONLY THE DISTRICT COURT’S DENIAL OF CERTAIN
ACCOMMODATIONS.
UPON CAREFUL REVIEW, WE CONCLUDE THAT THE
DISTRICT COURT APPROPRIATELY HANDLED FESENMEYER’S
1
THE HONORABLE STEPHEN R. BOUGH, UNITED STATES
DISTRICT JUDGE FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI.
-2-
VARIOUS REQUESTS FOR ACCOMMODATIONS. SEE 42 U.S.C.
§ 12131(1) (UNDER ADA, OMITTING FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
FROM DEFINITION OF PUBLIC ENTITY); CF. TENNESSEE V.
LANE,
541 U.S. 509, 522-23, 530-33 (2004) (DISCUSSING
REASONABLE-ACCOMMODATION REQUIREMENTS UNDER
ADA AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT). ACCORDINGLY, WE
AFFIRM. SEE 8TH CIR. R. 47B. ALL PENDING MOTIONS ARE
DENIED.
______________________________
-3-