Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Amie Reeves v. Carolyn W. Colvin, 15-3289 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 15-3289 Visitors: 41
Filed: May 27, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-3289 _ Amie Reeves lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City _ Submitted: May 24, 2016 Filed: May 27, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before SMITH, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Amie Reeves appeals the district
More
                 United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 15-3289
                        ___________________________

                                    Amie Reeves

                       lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

                                           v.

   Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration

                      lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
                                     ____________

                     Appeal from United States District Court
                for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
                                 ____________

                             Submitted: May 24, 2016
                               Filed: May 27, 2016
                                  [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before SMITH, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Amie Reeves appeals the district court’s1 order affirming the denial of
supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits. Upon de novo

      1
      The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Western District of Missouri.
review, see Lott v. Colvin, 
772 F.3d 546
, 548-49 (8th Cir. 2014), we conclude that
the two narrow issues Ms. Reeves identifies do not provide a basis for reversing the
administrative law judge’s (ALJ’s) determination that she is not disabled. To warrant
remand, a claimant must show prejudice from an error during administrative
proceedings, see Samons v. Astrue, 
497 F.3d 813
, 821 (8th Cir. 2007); and an ALJ’s
failure to cite certain evidence does not indicate that the evidence was not considered,
see Craig v. Apfel, 
212 F.3d 433
, 436 (8th Cir. 2000). The judgment of the district
court is affirmed.
                          ______________________________




                                          -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer