Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ryan Koerdt v. Sheridan School District, 15-1769 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 15-1769 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 20, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-1769 _ Ryan Koerdt lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Sheridan School District; Brenda Haynes, Individually and in her official capacity as Superintendent of the Sheridan School District lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff _ Submitted: March 16, 2016 Filed: June 20, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, BENTON, and SHEPHER
More
                 United States Court of Appeals
                              For the Eighth Circuit

                        ___________________________

                                No. 15-1769
                        ___________________________

                                    Ryan Koerdt

                       lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

                                           v.

Sheridan School District; Brenda Haynes, Individually and in her official capacity
               as Superintendent of the Sheridan School District

                     lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
                                      ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                 for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff
                                  ____________

                            Submitted: March 16, 2016
                               Filed: June 20, 2016
                                 [Unpublished]
                                 ____________

Before WOLLMAN, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________

PER CURIAM.
        Ryan Koerdt appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment
in his employment-discrimination action. Having considered the briefs and the record
in light of the standard of review set forth in Jain v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., 
779 F.3d 753
, 759 (8th Cir. 2015), we conclude that no extended discussion is necessary, and
thus we affirm on the basis of the district court’s opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                        ______________________________




      1
       The Honorable James M. Moody, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Arkansas.

                                        -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer