Kimberly Kenney v. University of Arkansas, 16-1270 (2016)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Number: 16-1270
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-1270 _ Kimberly Kenney lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. University of Arkansas at Little Rock; University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; Rainwater Holt & Sexton; Central for Arkansas Legal Services; University of Arkansas Human Resource Department; University of Arkansas Department of Public Safety; University of Arkansas Student Accounts; University of Arkansas Financial Aid Office; Equal Employment Opportunity Comm
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-1270 _ Kimberly Kenney lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. University of Arkansas at Little Rock; University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences; Rainwater Holt & Sexton; Central for Arkansas Legal Services; University of Arkansas Human Resource Department; University of Arkansas Department of Public Safety; University of Arkansas Student Accounts; University of Arkansas Financial Aid Office; Equal Employment Opportunity Commi..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-1270
___________________________
Kimberly Kenney
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
University of Arkansas at Little Rock; University of Arkansas for Medical
Sciences; Rainwater Holt & Sexton; Central for Arkansas Legal Services;
University of Arkansas Human Resource Department; University of Arkansas
Department of Public Safety; University of Arkansas Student Accounts;
University of Arkansas Financial Aid Office; Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock
____________
Submitted: June 23, 2106
Filed: June 27, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Kimberly Kenney appeals the district court’s1 preservice dismissal of her pro
se complaint alleging employment discrimination and claims related to state-court
litigation. Following careful de novo review, see Moore v. Sims,
200 F.3d 1170,
1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.
-2-
Source: CourtListener