Filed: Jul. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-3333 _ Brock Meeler lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. LVNV Funding, LLC; Hosto & Buchan, PLLC; Brien Saputo, Individually lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock _ Submitted: July 7, 2016 Filed: July 15, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before COLLOTON, GRUENDER, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Brock Meeler appeals the distric
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-3333 _ Brock Meeler lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. LVNV Funding, LLC; Hosto & Buchan, PLLC; Brien Saputo, Individually lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock _ Submitted: July 7, 2016 Filed: July 15, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before COLLOTON, GRUENDER, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Brock Meeler appeals the district..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-3333
___________________________
Brock Meeler
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
LVNV Funding, LLC; Hosto & Buchan, PLLC; Brien Saputo, Individually
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock
____________
Submitted: July 7, 2016
Filed: July 15, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, GRUENDER, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Brock Meeler appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his complaint under the
Federal Debt Collection Practices Act. Upon de novo review, we conclude that the
1
The Honorable Billy Roy Wilson, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.
dismissal was proper, for the reasons stated by the district court. See H & Q
Properties, Inc. v. Doll,
793 F.3d 852, 855 (8th Cir. 2015) (court reviews de novo
district court’s grant of motion to dismiss).
The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-