Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Brock Meeler v. LVNV Funding, LLC, 15-3333 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 15-3333 Visitors: 28
Filed: Jul. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-3333 _ Brock Meeler lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. LVNV Funding, LLC; Hosto & Buchan, PLLC; Brien Saputo, Individually lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock _ Submitted: July 7, 2016 Filed: July 15, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before COLLOTON, GRUENDER, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Brock Meeler appeals the distric
More
                  United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 15-3333
                         ___________________________

                                     Brock Meeler

                        lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

                                            v.

    LVNV Funding, LLC; Hosto & Buchan, PLLC; Brien Saputo, Individually

                      lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
                                       ____________

                     Appeal from United States District Court
                 for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock
                                  ____________

                               Submitted: July 7, 2016
                                Filed: July 15, 2016
                                   [Unpublished]
                                   ____________

Before COLLOTON, GRUENDER, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
                        ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Brock Meeler appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his complaint under the
Federal Debt Collection Practices Act. Upon de novo review, we conclude that the


      1
        The Honorable Billy Roy Wilson, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.
dismissal was proper, for the reasons stated by the district court. See H & Q
Properties, Inc. v. Doll, 
793 F.3d 852
, 855 (8th Cir. 2015) (court reviews de novo
district court’s grant of motion to dismiss).

      The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                      ______________________________




                                       -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer