Dennis LaChance v. Carolyn W. Colvin, 15-3010 (2016)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Number: 15-3010
Visitors: 62
Filed: Aug. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-3010 _ Dennis G. LaChance lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis _ Submitted: August 3, 2016 Filed: August 8, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Dennis G. LaChance
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-3010 _ Dennis G. LaChance lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis _ Submitted: August 3, 2016 Filed: August 8, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Dennis G. LaChance a..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 15-3010
___________________________
Dennis G. LaChance
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: August 3, 2016
Filed: August 8, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Dennis G. LaChance appeals from the order of the District Court1 affirming the
Commissioner’s decision to deny disability insurance benefits made after a hearing
before an administrative law judge. We have reviewed the record de novo and
considered LaChance’s submissions on appeal, and we are satisfied that the decision
is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole; that the new material
submitted by LaChance does not warrant reconsideration of the benefits decision; and
that his arguments on appeal provide no basis for remand or reversal. We affirm the
judgment of the District Court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable David D. Noce, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent
of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).
-2-
Source: CourtListener