Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

81-1534 (1982)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 81-1534 Visitors: 15
Filed: May 11, 1982
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 677 F.2d 666 Dr. Premanand V. WAGH, Appellant, v. James L. DENNIS, Chancellor; Thomas A. Bruce, Dean, in their individual and official capacities as agents of the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Appellees. No. 81-1534. United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. Submitted May 7, 1982. Decided May 11, 1982. John W. Walker, Richard Quiggle, Little Rock, Ark., for appellant. Nelwyn Davis, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock, Ark., Ray Trammell, Gen. Counsel, Fayetteville, Ark., for appel
More

677 F.2d 666

Dr. Premanand V. WAGH, Appellant,
v.
James L. DENNIS, Chancellor; Thomas A. Bruce, Dean, in their
individual and official capacities as agents of
the University of Arkansas for Medical
Sciences, Appellees.

No. 81-1534.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 7, 1982.
Decided May 11, 1982.

John W. Walker, Richard Quiggle, Little Rock, Ark., for appellant.

Nelwyn Davis, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock, Ark., Ray Trammell, Gen. Counsel, Fayetteville, Ark., for appellees.

Before HEANEY, HENLEY and McMILLIAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

Premanand V. Wagh appeals the dismissal by the district court1 of his complaint asserting a claim under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983 as being barred by the three-year Arkansas statute of limitations governing liabilities created by statute. Ark.Stat.Ann. § 37-206. We affirm.

2

Appellant asserts that since his case involves termination of his written employment contract that the five-year Arkansas statute of limitations governing actions on written contracts should control. Ark.Stat.Ann. § 37-209. This argument is without merit. The choice between sections 37-209 and 37-206 for a civil rights action involving termination or non-renewal of an employment contract has been presented to this court on several occasions and each time this court has held that the appropriate statute of limitations is section 37-206. Marshall v. Kirkland, 602 F.2d 1282 (8th Cir. 1979); Martin v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., 568 F.2d 58 (8th Cir. 1977); Clark v. Mann, 562 F.2d 1104 (8th Cir. 1977).

3

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

1

The Honorable Henry Woods, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer