Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Darnell Norton, 15-3927 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 15-3927 Visitors: 41
Filed: Oct. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-3927 _ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee v. Darnell Michael Norton, also known as Dino lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Sioux City _ Submitted: October 4, 2016 Filed: October 7, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before SMITH, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Darnell Michael Norton appeals after the distr
More
              United States Court of Appeals
                         For the Eighth Circuit
                     ___________________________

                             No. 15-3927
                     ___________________________

                          United States of America

                     lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

                                        v.

                Darnell Michael Norton, also known as Dino

                   lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant
                                   ____________

                 Appeal from United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Iowa - Sioux City
                              ____________

                         Submitted: October 4, 2016
                          Filed: October 7, 2016
                              [Unpublished]
                              ____________

Before SMITH, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.
      Darnell Michael Norton appeals after the district court1 denied his motion for
a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). Having jurisdiction under 28
U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

       The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a sentence reduction,
as it adequately examined the sentencing factors and public safety concerns, and
explained its reasoning. See United States v. Long, 
757 F.3d 762
, 763 (8th Cir. 2014)
(abuse-of-discretion review of discretionary decision whether to grant authorized §
3582(c)(2) modification); see also United States v. Curry, 
584 F.3d 1102
, 1103-05
(8th Cir. 2009) (district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to reduce
defendant’s sentence under § 3582(c)(2) due to defendant's criminal history).

      The judgment is affirmed and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted.
                      ______________________________




      1
       The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the Northern District of Iowa.

                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer