James Wolf v. Hoene Ridge Subdivision, 16-1143 (2016)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Number: 16-1143
Visitors: 19
Filed: Oct. 14, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-1143 _ James Eugene Wolf lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Hoene Ridge Subdivision; Kelly A. Kelly lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis _ Submitted: August 1, 2016 Filed: October 14, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. James Eugene Wolf appeals the district court’s1 order dis
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-1143 _ James Eugene Wolf lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Hoene Ridge Subdivision; Kelly A. Kelly lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis _ Submitted: August 1, 2016 Filed: October 14, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. James Eugene Wolf appeals the district court’s1 order dism..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-1143
___________________________
James Eugene Wolf
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Hoene Ridge Subdivision; Kelly A. Kelly
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
___________________________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: August 1, 2016
Filed: October 14, 2016
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, BENTON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
James Eugene Wolf appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing his claims
under 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, 844, and 1961 et seq.; and 42 U.S.C. §§ 3631and 12101
et seq. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.
1
The Honorable Ronnie L. White, United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Missouri.
A careful review of the record reveals that Wolf is not entitled to relief for the
reasons stated by the district court. The motion to strike appellees’ brief is denied.
The judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
Source: CourtListener