Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Charles Swift v. Wadie Thomas, 16-3200 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 16-3200 Visitors: 26
Filed: Oct. 21, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-3200 _ Charles Swift lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Wadie Thomas; Matthew Kahler lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha _ Submitted: October 20, 2016 Filed: October 21, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Charles Swift appeals after the district court1 dismissed, without prejudice,
More
                 United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 16-3200
                         ___________________________

                                     Charles Swift

                        lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

                                            v.

                          Wadie Thomas; Matthew Kahler

                       lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
                                        ____________

                     Appeal from United States District Court
                       for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
                                  ____________

                            Submitted: October 20, 2016
                              Filed: October 21, 2016
                                  [Unpublished]
                                  ____________

Before WOLLMAN, ARNOLD, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________

PER CURIAM.

      Charles Swift appeals after the district court1 dismissed, without prejudice, his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 complaint requesting that the district court impose directions upon a

      1
      The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District
of Nebraska.
state-court judge. Upon careful review, and for the reasons stated by the district
court, we conclude that the dismissal was proper. See Moore v. Sims, 
200 F.3d 1170
,
1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) dismissal is reviewed de novo).


       Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                      ______________________________




                                            -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer