Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Paul Katekaru v. Cameron Egan, 15-3662 (2016)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 15-3662 Visitors: 27
Filed: Nov. 03, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 15-3662 _ Paul David Katekaru lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Cameron Egan, Officer; Greg Bryant, Sergeant; Terri Cipolla Round; City of Lee’s Summit, Missouri lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City _ Submitted: October 31, 2016 Filed: November 3, 2016 [Unpublished] _ Before SMITH, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PE
More
                United States Court of Appeals
                           For the Eighth Circuit
                       ___________________________

                               No. 15-3662
                       ___________________________

                               Paul David Katekaru

                       lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

                                           v.

Cameron Egan, Officer; Greg Bryant, Sergeant; Terri Cipolla Round; City of Lee’s
                              Summit, Missouri

                     lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
                                      ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
               for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
                                ____________

                          Submitted: October 31, 2016
                            Filed: November 3, 2016
                                 [Unpublished]
                                 ____________

Before SMITH, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.
       Paul Katekaru appeals after the district court1 adversely granted summary
judgment on two of his claims, dismissed a third claim without prejudice for lack of
standing, and denied his post-judgment motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
59(e). After carefully reviewing the record, and parties’ arguments on appeal, we find
no basis to reverse. See Brooks v. Roy, 
776 F.3d 957
, 959-60 (8th Cir. 2015) (grant
of summary judgment reviewed de novo); Hodak v. City of St. Peters, 
535 F.3d 899
,
903 (8th Cir. 2008) (determination as to plaintiff’s standing reviewed de novo);
United States v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist., 
440 F.3d 930
, 933-34 (8th Cir. 2006)
(denial of Rule 59(e) motion reviewed for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we
affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                        ______________________________




      1
      The Honorable Greg Kays, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the
Western District of Missouri.

                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer