Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Adam Rouillard, 16-2474 (2017)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 16-2474 Visitors: 36
Filed: Feb. 08, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-2474 _ United States of America, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Adam Rouillard, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant. _ No. 16-2476 _ United States of America, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Adam Rouillard, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant. _ Appeals from United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Sioux City _ Submitted: February 3, 2017 Filed: February 8, 2017 [
More
United States Court of Appeals
         For the Eighth Circuit
     ___________________________

             No. 16-2474
     ___________________________

          United States of America,

     lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee,

                         v.

                Adam Rouillard,

   lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant.
      ___________________________

             No. 16-2476
     ___________________________

          United States of America,

     lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee,

                         v.

                Adam Rouillard,

   lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant.
                    ____________

 Appeals from United States District Court
for the Northern District of Iowa - Sioux City
               ____________

         Submitted: February 3, 2017
           Filed: February 8, 2017
                [Unpublished]
               ____________
Before SMITH, ARNOLD, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.

       In these consolidated appeals, Adam Rouillard challenges the sentence the
district court1 imposed upon revoking his second term of supervised release. In each
case, his counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief questioning
the reasonableness of Rouillard’s revocation sentence. Rouillard has not filed a
supplemental brief.

      After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not
abuse its discretion in sentencing Rouillard. See United States v. Miller, 
557 F.3d 910
, 915-18 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review); see also United States v. Perkins,
526 F.3d 1107
, 1110-11 (8th Cir. 2008) (this court reviews entire sentencing record,
not merely district court’s statements at hearing).

       Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motions for leave to withdraw, and we affirm
the judgment of the district court.
                       ______________________________




      1
      The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the
Northern District of Iowa.

                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer