Omar Erazo-Martinez v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III, 16-2487 (2017)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Number: 16-2487
Visitors: 15
Filed: May 09, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-2487 _ Omar Enrique Erazo-Martinez lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III,1 Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: May 5, 2017 Filed: May 9, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before RILEY, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Honduran citizen Omar Enrique Erazo-Martinez petitions for review of an
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-2487 _ Omar Enrique Erazo-Martinez lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Jefferson B. Sessions, III,1 Attorney General of the United States lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals _ Submitted: May 5, 2017 Filed: May 9, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before RILEY, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Honduran citizen Omar Enrique Erazo-Martinez petitions for review of an o..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-2487
___________________________
Omar Enrique Erazo-Martinez
lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner
v.
Jefferson B. Sessions, III,1 Attorney General of the United States
lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
____________
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
____________
Submitted: May 5, 2017
Filed: May 9, 2017
[Unpublished]
____________
Before RILEY, MURPHY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Honduran citizen Omar Enrique Erazo-Martinez petitions for review of an
order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing his appeal from a decision of
1
Jefferson B. Sessions, III has been appointed to serve as Attorney General of
the United States and automatically is substituted as respondent pursuant to Federal
Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(2).
an immigration judge denying his application for cancellation of removal under 8
U.S.C. ยง 1229b(b)(1). We conclude the arguments he presents to this court are
unavailing, and thus we deny the petition. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-
Source: CourtListener