Filed: May 17, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-2854 _ Elease Hill; Carlton Newsome; Vada Smith lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants v. City of El Dorado, an Incorporated Body through Mayor Frank Hass in his Official Capacity as Mayor and City Council in their Individual Official Capacity as the City Council of El Dorado lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - El Dorado _ Submitted: May 1
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-2854 _ Elease Hill; Carlton Newsome; Vada Smith lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants v. City of El Dorado, an Incorporated Body through Mayor Frank Hass in his Official Capacity as Mayor and City Council in their Individual Official Capacity as the City Council of El Dorado lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - El Dorado _ Submitted: May 10..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 16-2854
___________________________
Elease Hill; Carlton Newsome; Vada Smith
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiffs - Appellants
v.
City of El Dorado, an Incorporated Body through Mayor Frank Hass in his Official
Capacity as Mayor and City Council in their Individual Official Capacity as the
City Council of El Dorado
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Arkansas - El Dorado
____________
Submitted: May 10, 2017
Filed: May 17, 2017
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, ARNOLD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Elease Hill, Carlton Newsome, and Vada Smith appeal the district court’s1
adverse grant of summary judgment in their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Appellants have
identified no valid basis for reversal of the rulings they challenge, and we find none.2
See Malone v. Hinman,
847 F.3d 949, 952 (8th Cir. 2017) (de novo review). The
judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
1
The Honorable Susan O. Hickey, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Arkansas.
2
We have not considered arguments appellants raise for the first time on appeal.
See Schaffer v. Beringer,
842 F.3d 585, 592 n.2 (8th Cir. 2016), petition for cert. filed,
U.S. Feb. 17, 2017 (No. 16-1262).
-2-