Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Kesheanna Jackson v. Norac, Inc., 16-2971 (2017)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 16-2971 Visitors: 33
Filed: May 24, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-2971 _ Kesheanna Jackson lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Norac, Inc. (originally named as Norac Additives Inc), doing business as Norac Additives lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena _ Submitted: May 19, 2017 Filed: May 24, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. In this employment
More
                  United States Court of Appeals
                              For the Eighth Circuit
                          ___________________________

                                  No. 16-2971
                          ___________________________

                                  Kesheanna Jackson

                         lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

                                             v.

Norac, Inc. (originally named as Norac Additives Inc), doing business as Norac Additives

                        lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee
                                       ____________

                     Appeal from United States District Court
                    for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena
                                   ____________

                               Submitted: May 19, 2017
                                 Filed: May 24, 2017
                                    [Unpublished]
                                    ____________

Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
                           ____________

PER CURIAM.

       In this employment-discrimination action, Kesheanna Jackson appeals the
district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment on her harassment and retaliation

      1
       The Honorable D.P. Marshall Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern
District of Arkansas.
claims under Title VII and the Arkansas Civil Rights Act. Having jurisdiction under 28
U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.

       This court agrees with the district court’s reasoning and concludes that
summary judgment was properly granted. See Beaulieu v. Ludeman, 
690 F.3d 1017
,
1024 (8th Cir. 2012) (grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo, viewing
record in light most favorable to nonmovant); Integrity Floorcovering, Inc. v.
Broan-Nutone, LLC, 
521 F.3d 914
, 917 (8th Cir. 2008) (district court’s determination
of state law is reviewed de novo).

      The judgment is affirmed.
                     ______________________________




                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer